31-08-2010, 01:36 PM
Maturski, Seminarski , Maturalni i diplomski radovi iz ekonomije: menadzment, marketing, finansija, elektronskog poslovanja, internet tehnologija, biznis planovi, makroekonomija, mikroekonomija, preduzetnistvo, upravljanje ljudskim resursima, carine i porezi.
A disjunct is a type of an adverbial adjunct which expresses information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's own attitude towards, or the descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence. A disjunct does not fit into the flow of the sentence and is often separated by a comma or a set of commas. A disjunct normally acts as an evaluation of the rest of the sentence. Although it usually modifies the verb, we could say that it modifies the entire clause, too.
The name 'disjunct' would seem to suggest that these have some kind of connection with (con)junctive items, but that their role is, if anything, to signal an absence of conjunction. The distinction between conjuncts (however, in addition, etc.) and disjuncts is now well established and corresponds to a broader distinction, based on the propositional view of cohesion outlined above, between text-structuring and writer's comment, which are seen as largely unrelated. Their approach emphasizes that the scope of disjuncts is simply the sentence in which they appear ('contributing another facet of information to a single integrated unit') while conjuncts function between clauses or other elements ('conjoining independent units'). ..
Disjuncts and adjuncts
What is the difference between disjuncts on one hand and adjuncts and subjuncts on the other? Consider the adverbials in the following sentences:
1. Sadly, you have failed the exam
2. Mary is, in all frankness, acting very strangely.
3. Since he made that mistake, he couldn’t be a part of the team.
We note, first of all, that it is not the form of these adverbials that makes them different from adjuncts or even from subjuncts:
4. The student stared sadly at the professor.
5. The witness talked in all frankness about the night of the crime.
6. He couldn’t be a part of the team since he made that mistake.
It is not the position of the adverbials in 1, 2. and 3 either. If we moved the adverbials sadly, in all frankness and since to the end of the sentences in 4, 5. And 6 and we would leave their grammatical relations mostly unchanged and still extremely different from the grammatical relations of the adverbials in 1, 2. And 3. The adverbials in 4, 5 and 6 can be made the focus of a cleft sentence. They can also be the basis of contrast in alternative interrogation or negation; can be focused by focusing subjuncts; and can come within the scope of predication pro-forms or ellipsis and all this because of their adjunct status: ...
Sadržaj :
INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 Disjuncts and adjuncts 3
1.2 Classification accodring to Quirk et al. 6
1.3 Content disjuncts 6
1.4 Classification according to Biber et al. 9
1.5 The ambiguity of disjuncts and other strustures 10
1.6 Position of disjuncts 11
1.7 Corpus analysis 12
1.8 Disjuncts: a syntactic overview 14
CONCLUSION 18
BIBLIOGRAPHY 18
A disjunct is a type of an adverbial adjunct which expresses information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's own attitude towards, or the descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence. A disjunct does not fit into the flow of the sentence and is often separated by a comma or a set of commas. A disjunct normally acts as an evaluation of the rest of the sentence. Although it usually modifies the verb, we could say that it modifies the entire clause, too.
The name 'disjunct' would seem to suggest that these have some kind of connection with (con)junctive items, but that their role is, if anything, to signal an absence of conjunction. The distinction between conjuncts (however, in addition, etc.) and disjuncts is now well established and corresponds to a broader distinction, based on the propositional view of cohesion outlined above, between text-structuring and writer's comment, which are seen as largely unrelated. Their approach emphasizes that the scope of disjuncts is simply the sentence in which they appear ('contributing another facet of information to a single integrated unit') while conjuncts function between clauses or other elements ('conjoining independent units'). ..
Disjuncts and adjuncts
What is the difference between disjuncts on one hand and adjuncts and subjuncts on the other? Consider the adverbials in the following sentences:
1. Sadly, you have failed the exam
2. Mary is, in all frankness, acting very strangely.
3. Since he made that mistake, he couldn’t be a part of the team.
We note, first of all, that it is not the form of these adverbials that makes them different from adjuncts or even from subjuncts:
4. The student stared sadly at the professor.
5. The witness talked in all frankness about the night of the crime.
6. He couldn’t be a part of the team since he made that mistake.
It is not the position of the adverbials in 1, 2. and 3 either. If we moved the adverbials sadly, in all frankness and since to the end of the sentences in 4, 5. And 6 and we would leave their grammatical relations mostly unchanged and still extremely different from the grammatical relations of the adverbials in 1, 2. And 3. The adverbials in 4, 5 and 6 can be made the focus of a cleft sentence. They can also be the basis of contrast in alternative interrogation or negation; can be focused by focusing subjuncts; and can come within the scope of predication pro-forms or ellipsis and all this because of their adjunct status: ...
Sadržaj :
INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 Disjuncts and adjuncts 3
1.2 Classification accodring to Quirk et al. 6
1.3 Content disjuncts 6
1.4 Classification according to Biber et al. 9
1.5 The ambiguity of disjuncts and other strustures 10
1.6 Position of disjuncts 11
1.7 Corpus analysis 12
1.8 Disjuncts: a syntactic overview 14
CONCLUSION 18
BIBLIOGRAPHY 18